Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Peer-review policy

Peer review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Independent researchers in the relevant research area assess submitted manuscripts for originality, validity and significance to help Editors determine whether the manuscript should be published in their journal. You can read more about the peer-review process here.

Contraception and Reproductive Medicine operates a single-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous. The benefit of single-blind peer review is that it is the traditional model of peer review that many reviewers are comfortable with, and it facilitates a dispassionate critique of a manuscript.

Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two or more experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates already published work, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board.

Annual Journal Metrics

  • Citation Impact
    Journal Impact Factor: 2.2 (2023)    
    5-year Journal Impact Factor: 3.4 (2023)    
    Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP): 1.030 (2024)    
    SCImago Journal Rank (SJR): 0.556 (2024)

    Speed 
    Submission to first editorial decision (median days): 10
    Submission to acceptance (median days): 88

    Usage 2024
    Downloads: 329,198
    Altmetric mentions: 205

Featured Editorial: Wrong rulings come from wrong science

New Content ItemFollowing the Supreme Court ruling in Alabama, USA on the use of embryos in IVF, read our editorial by Dr Anita Nelson and Dr Margaret English that discusses the clinical implications of the ruling and potential consequences.